• Sign In
  1. Messages

Creating an Ancillary study with assay data in parent study

LabKey Support Forum (Inactive)

View Message

view list print
Creating an Ancillary study with assay data in parent study Anthony Corbett  2013-01-21 06:59
Status: Closed
 

I was trying to create an ancillary study from an larger study. This original study had some datasets which were assay data that was copied to the study. I selected a participant group for the participants I wanted to use in the ancillary study, then I choose ALL datasets (including the assay datasets) and I received errors like the following while it was trying to create the new study:


1 -
An error occurred trying to create the study: Error importing study objects : org.springframework.validation.BeanPropertyBindingResult: 1 errors Error in object 'form': codes [importDatasetSchemas.form,importDatasetSchemas]; arguments []; default message [Field name cannot end with the suffix 'mvIndicator': cd62lp_mvindicator]

2 -
An error occurred trying to create the study: Error importing study objects : org.springframework.validation.BeanPropertyBindingResult: 1 errors Error in object 'form': codes [importDatasetSchemas.form,importDatasetSchemas]; arguments []; default message [Field name cannot end with the suffix 'mvIndicator': h1_ha_mvindicator]


These errors are pointing to datasets which were assay data copied to the study. I do not have control over the design (field names, enabling MVIndicators) for these assay datasets.

I had to end up leaving out these assay datasets in order to get the ancillary study to be created.

Any advice?
 
 
jeckels responded:  2013-01-25 17:19
Hi Anthony,

I was unable to reproduce this error, though I can see where it's being generated in the code.

Is there perhaps a field in the assay design with a name that ends in "MVIndicator", instead of a field with MV Indicators enabled? The server doesn't let you create new fields that have a name ending in "MVIndicator" but maybe there's a field that predates that check, or came in through some other mechanism that doesn't validate the suffix?

Thanks,
Josh